When a company has delivered thousands of grinders and never had this issue reported before they're not going to be particularly likely to take your word for it that you didn't use RDT and didn't have the grinder positioned in a place where it might come into contact with excessive moisture (e.g. it's in the kitchen, you put a steaming bowl of whatever down in front of it and the moisture goes up the spout and is absorbed by trapped coffee). I use the last example because I find myself almost doing it all the time just because of the layout of the kitchen. It's natural for the company to be sceptical about your claims given the rust present and natural for them to investigate it further. I'd expect them to refund you if they find anything wrong, if not good luck proving a manufacturing defect yourself.
How have you come to the conclusion that the grinder needs to be cleaned based on how much coffee has been put through it rather than how long it has been used....obviously the grinder needs to have had SOME coffee put through it but after that, when the gaps have been filled (which happens very quickly) what makes you think it's a quantity and not a time issue? Corrosion happens over time, not because of quantities.
I think the problem here is likely to be use case. You haven't changed your grind setting. Changing grind setting coarse and finer will stop coffee getting trapped and help remove moisture build up within the coffee (it gets hot in there). The two other people you found who haven't cleaned their Niche in two years may well have been adjusting the grinder fairly regularly and thus the coffee would not be so compacted around the burrs.......this is actually a design fault. Depending on how often Niche recommend cleaning the burrs (not based on quantity) you may be able to claim the grinder is not fit for purpose based on the design, if this is the issue. I'm guessing it's extremely unusual for somebody not to change the grind setting (even using the same coffee) and this might not be something that was tested, especially over such a long period of time without cleaning. How often they recommend cleaning the grinder would be crucial (a period of time or throughput).
I don't know what you're referring to in the first part. Unfortunately, the law isn't something you can decide by simply thinking carefully. I have no legal knowledge and haven't consulted a solicitor, have you? If not, perhaps you should since you seem to be intending to go down that route. I'd be surprised if there wasn't a law allowing manufacturers to retain parts of faulty products for inspection so long as replacements are provided (whether you paid for them or not or paid a 'service fee'). They will probably have to return them to you if you request them in due time. I agree in principal the parts belong to you and you should have access to them should you want to fund your own independent investigation, and if they don't have to return the parts to you legally they probably will have to turn them over for independent study in any legal proceedings you bring. Why are you so reluctant to allow Niche to inspect the parts and report back to you their findings? They might refund you yet. Is this not a discussion you've had with them?
I am not going to answer everything you have raised here as I have provided information that covers most of it.
I hinted and gave James and Sam every opportunity to come forwards with an offer of good will in fact, when discussing the old parts, I actually said to Sam that had they had done the repair on good will, I would not have minded for them to keep and inspect them. But and since the repairs have come at a high cost and james replay to my deep inspection request, I was (and am) not confortable with them keeping them. Sadly No offer of good will has come forwards.
Shocked by the damage, I clearly instructed James to inspect the parts carefully for any signs of manufacturing defects. I have posted his answer in a previous post
Yes, I have issues with them keeping the parts because I specifically asked for them and, They only decided to "study" the parts after informing them of my intention to send them to a metallurgist. Why was this study not conducted when I asked James to look for defects and before deciding to charge me?
Another thing that has come to light. At around 2pm yesterday, I was informed by Sam that the grinder had been posted. I received a ping today from DPD saying they have just got it. If it was posted today and not yesterday, the parts may be included. I was under the impression the package had already left and was told by Sam the parts will not arrive with the unit. But, in view of the new information, I shall update accordingly.
The units are made in China and, manufacturing process are not free from errors. I did not abuse the product and, if missing 3 maintenance windows because of low usage, has resulted in catastrophic failure then I am of the opinion the unit was defective from factory
I understand they may privately question my honesty when I say I have not used water but, that's the truth and by the same hand, and knowing what usage and treatment the unit has had, I am entirely entitled to question their assessment.
And I am really done discussing this. it has taken enough of my time.
Have a great weekend.