Coffee Forums banner
981 - 1,000 of 3,176 Posts
Hello,

I got the machine since Thursday. I upgraded from a Faema Faemina from 1958 , which I considered doing really good coffee. Boy, I was wrong. Today I finally managed to hit the sweat spot of this incredible, beautiful machine. And the espresso was unearthly good. I don't want to be too exaggerating, but that clearly was the best espresso I've had in my life so far. And I love to drink espresso, wherever I go. I am extremely jazzed by this machine, which is not doing an incredible job, but is a real looker.

Cheers
great to hear! Which grinder is it paired with, any pictures of your set up?
 
If I pack the stock basket with 15g of finely ground coffee vs 18g of a little coarser grind, would there be a little more resistance at 15g than 18g?

I am curious what happens to the extraction, 2) how the mass and surface area differ, 3) how the density of the puck differ and change the cup. I know we can't answer unless we try these on the machine.

Another doubt is what is important - is it the mass or density ?

I would assume other things being equal for these doubts.

Sorry to post such basic questions, which deviate from the main intent of this thread; there is no need to answer if seen not relevant. Thanks
 
It's worth bearing in mind, surface area has no mass and cannot be extracted. If you halve the average diameter of the particles you decrease the volume of the average sized particles to 1/8th.
I'm not taking sides and my knowledge of coffee extraction is well below that of both the parties here, but I'm interested in understanding the physics of the process.

Any chemical and thermodynamics exchange happens through a boundary surface and is somewhat proportional to the area of the surface (that's why radiators have fins). Reducing the average particle size by half reduces the area of the particles to one fourth and the volume to one eighth, so the total area for the same volume (and consequently same mass) is double. Surely this larger exchange area must increase the extraction (or speed of it) to some extent, right?
 
If I pack the stock basket with 15g of finely ground coffee vs 18g of a little coarser grind, would there be a little more resistance at 15g than 18g?
If you overfill the basket you're extraction can drop & sourness creep in. If you underfill the basket, then the puck an be more disturbed prior to full pressure being applied, this might have the same effect, or can make nominal extractions siltier, not increasing extraction, but making it taste a little drier/less acidic at nominal extraction. What is the dose that people are finding works? Use that.

Resistance will depend on grind setting, as much as dose.

I am curious what happens to the extraction, 2) how the mass and surface area differ, 3) how the density of the puck differ and change the cup. I know we can't answer unless we try these on the machine.
18g and 15g have the same mass at whatever grind setting you are at. Forget surface area, concentrate on dose & grind setting. You change puck density by changing dose & grind (assuming nominal tamp, which has a wide tolerance). Changes in the cup will follow extraction yield & non-dissolved solids content...more of both with finer grinds, until extraction peaks, then less extracton, but still more non-dissolved solids (which may counter sourness, or present both bitterness/powderyness & sourness.

Another doubt is what is important - is it the mass or density ?
Appropriate dose, ratio & grind setting are important. Density is a byproduct of dose & grind, mass is mass with a little tolerance from datum. Grind is relative to brew ratio and perceived acidity (finer to tame sourness at a workable ratio for espresso roasts, coarser for longer shots/overly silty shots.

The questions aren't that basic, but more maybe obscuring the wood for the trees? :) Coffee brewing is mass transfer - grind follows the amount for brew water used/extraction level required (finer = more extraction/less water, coarser = less extraction/more water). Density relate more to permeability - if you grind too fine & nutate/decrease permeability somehow, extraction will drop. The dose has to be permeable enough to let water pass evenly through it.
 
I'm not taking sides and my knowledge of coffee extraction is well below that of both the parties here, but I'm interested in understanding the physics of the process.

Any chemical and thermodynamics exchange happens through a boundary surface and is somehow proportional to the area of the surface (that's why radiators have fins). Reducing the average particle size by half reduces the area of the particles to one fourth and the volume to one eighth, so the total area for the same volume (and consequently same mass) is double. Surely this larger exchange area must increase the extraction (or speed of it) to some extent, right?
Coffee particles are not 100% soluble, they're a non-soluble matrix containing pockets of soluble material. The surface area exposed is not all soluble material, like it would be in typical chemical extractions like, for example, sugar or salt in hot water. I guess if it were, we could just keep going finer & finer & extracting more & more, up to 100%...but this doesn't happen.

We're not simply washing the soluble material off the surface of the particles, we're washing it out of the volume/depth too.

In percolation (espresso/drip), the halving of the diameter/quartering of the surface area/reducing volume to 1 eighth allows more material to be extracted in the same mass of solvent, or equivalent material extracted in less solvent, for a similarly soluble coffee (these vary by origin). But coffee extraction being mass transfer exercise, it's the smaller volume that facilitates higher extraction. Area is a 2d concept, area has no mass. But, fair enough, the 3 concepts are inexorably linked given the assumption of average particles being roughly spherical. The only one we can visibly control/observe is grinder setting, this is undoubtedly the aspect of primary focus.

Time is too wide a tolerance for consideration in percolation, more relevance in immersion.

Total surface area may change at finer grinds from one grinder to another, then again it may not due to differences in grind size distribution, it will only change in a linear manner for a given grinder/distribution. We know that grinders have differing distributions & average grind sizes, but still work normally.
 
@MWJB Thank you so much. Very educative.

Your detailed explanation does raise my analytical curiosity further with respect to the final output. This is in relation to the taller 54 mm stock double basket - I believe is just about a half full (give or take some %) at 18g from the experience of the current owners - vs the IMS double basket. Even if there is a difference, only a super taster may be able to identify the difference and not a normal person like me 😂

I shall have a plenty of time to find out and am sure folks will also chip in with their experiences.

I will digest these slowly and hope to learn more when I have the Evo to play with.
 
@MWJB Thank you so much. Very educative.

Your detailed explanation does raise my analytical curiosity further with respect to the final output. This is in relation to the taller 54 mm stock double basket - I believe is just about a half full (give or take some %) at 18g from the experience of the current owners - vs the IMS double basket. Even if there is a difference, only a super taster may be able to identify the difference and not a normal person like me 😂

I shall have a plenty of time to find out and am sure folks will also chip in with their experiences.

I will digest these slowly and hope to learn more when I have the Evo to play with.
Going by posts on HB related to the izzo leva, I noticed several that said shots worked better when filled up to the point of getting imprinted by the shower screen circlip (I.e. without a gap). Obviously real world testing to prove either way. Am curious whether something like the bplus mesh will change this characteristic (if it exists on this machine)...
 
Mods have had to remove some posts on this thread that were clearly intent on causing trouble. We have been dismayed at the lengths some will go to, using fake accounts, the publication on another forum of images that mock and denigrate, in an attempt to damage the reputation of ACS and the Vesuvius Evo Leva.

Dave recently called out the behaviour of an ex-forum member who now contributes to another forum. If you check back a few posts on this thread you can see the lengths he went to in an attempt to trash ACS's reputation.

We now have another instance and as with the above, have decided to publish details as it has been taken up by the same ex-forum member (see below).

On June 12 forum member Dallah sent a PM to mods. He was concerned there have been fake accounts (not named) created with the sole intention of posting only 'pro' comments on the Evo Leva thread. Mods checked to see if Dallah's speculation had any merit and concluded there was none.

On June 13 Dallah posted the content of his PM to mods on the Evo Leva thread.

14 hours ago, Dallah said: https://coffeeforums.co.uk/topic/55415-new-1-group-lever-from-acs-vostok-1-group/?do=findComment&comment=847299

Without getting drawn into the, excuse the language, ******* match on this thread it has highlighted to me that there seem to be fake accounts on the "pro" side of the argument. I have seen at least two accounts which have been created in the last few months and have only posted on this thread. It seems obvious to me that they have been created only to help feed the buzz around this machine, which if the topic was anything financial, would lead to serious repercussions I don't know who is behind them and I wouldn't want to speculate but it might be worth the mods looking into it as this thread seems to descending from discourse into polemic at times.
Mods hid the above post and immediately PMd Dallah asking him to be more specific by naming the fake 'pro' accounts. Dallah was asked not to make any further posts on the matter on open forum whilst the mods performed further checks.

He chose not to respect mod guidance and posted the following inflammatory remarks alleging either corruption an/or something being seriously wrong.

13 hours ago, Dallah said: https://coffeeforums.co.uk/topic/55415-new-1-group-lever-from-acs-vostok-1-group/?do=findComment&comment=847303

Where did my post go? I sent the mods a PM that something was rotten in Denmark yesterday and it was ignored. So posted the content of that PM here on this thread and instant action to delete my post. Unfortunately I'm not surprised. I don't know what is happening here but I know I don't like it.
After this post he also PMd mods and gave the name one CFUK account as being 'pretty obvious'. We were certain this was a genuine account and asked the member's permission to check personal data with ACS. This was granted. ACS confirmed the member in question is a genuine customer and has placed an order.

If the above is not bad enough, it was seized upon by a member of another forum, making comments that CFUK suppresses 'TRUTH' and encourages fake accounts.

1590286664_Screenshot2021-06-13at21_35_50.thumb.png.db44b0777143dfefd994495295ed314f.png

CFUK prides itself on being non partisan. Debate and discussion is the life blood of the forum. Members are welcome and encouraged to share their views - to agree and disagree but to do so fairly, respectfully and reasonably in line with the forum guidelines.

This is a new machine to the market which a small minority (outside this forum) seem to strongly object to, presumably because they see it as some sort of threat. We can't do anything about the unsavoury behaviour of this group, except perhaps shine a light on it, rather than let it fester in the darkness.
 

Attachments

Less headspace creates more crema and thicker shots, this doesn't mean they are more extracted, it just means the mouthfeel is different. Finer grind less crema (related to more headspace) coarser grind more crema (less headspace).

Decent V1.0 had 6mm more headspace than other machine on the market, and people asked why they have to grind much finer on it. They reduced the headspace starting with v1.1 but it still has more headspace than other machines.
 
Going by posts on HB related to the izzo leva, I noticed several that said shots worked better when filled up to the point of getting imprinted by the shower screen circlip (I.e. without a gap). Obviously real world testing to prove either way. Am curious whether something like the bplus mesh will change this characteristic (if it exists on this machine)...
Depends on what people characterise as "work better" More body and mouthfeel? More extraction yield ?

its easy to say taste better but again, so many variables ( preference and type of coffee used ) that it makes general comments somewhat meaningless without a little more context.
 
Small water tap and long steam wand.

I know a friend in Vienna got one/payed the deposit and now you in US and I believe the second batch is pretty much full (if it settles to 10 machines max number). I also have 2 or 3 more friends waiting for me to get the machine so they can test it and then they will make their mind if to order or not.

It's either this or Decent and since I will have both it will be easy for them to compare what they like. I strongly believe the decent will fall behind a lot.
 
It's either this or Decent and since I will have both it will be easy for them to compare what they like.
That will be an interesting test and I look forward to reading your thoughts down the line.

Suspect the Evo will be compared with other machines as well which will be equally interesting.
 
@danielpugh, @Mrboots2u , @MWJB

I understand, with my limited exposure in coffee making, there are too many variables in the mix, which makes the task of deciding which taste better very difficult. If we add the grinder, grind size and the machine, the effort, time and resources spent in deciding these tricky question (or might be silly to some) will push the outcome towards the *** end of diminishing returns.

Some could state that it is the EY, which decides the outcome. This is beyond the affordability range for the majority. The others could make a compelling argument that taste and mouthfeel are the King or Queen. These two are again relative.

Normal people may never be able to differentiate. This may be the case even for some like me. Hence, the reliance on coffee experts to share their experience, which we know they do after pulling comparable shots.
 
@Denis Swould you not think the decent is a totally different machine compared to the leva? ive always been fascinated by them, but the slow steaming and the clicking is not for me
Honestly, I would love to see the comparison between the two - of course they are two massively different machines but I personally was rather close to ordering a decent over the Vostok, the reason I didn't was that although I love the idea of playing with every variable possible I feel I would eventually settle on a single profile (most likely a leaver one judging on the experiences of other users). the key aspect of what I wanted was repeatability less so experimentation.

The other (main) aspect why I didn't go for a decent is the aesthetics doesn't really do it for me. The offerings ACS have do though!
 
@danielpugh, @Mrboots2u , @MWJB

I understand, with my limited exposure in coffee making, there are too many variables in the mix, which makes the task of deciding which taste better very difficult. If we add the grinder, grind size and the machine, the effort, time and resources spent in deciding these tricky question (or might be silly to some) will push the outcome towards the *** end of diminishing returns.

Some could state that it is the EY, which decides the outcome. This is beyond the affordability range for the majority. The others could make a compelling argument that taste and mouthfeel are the King or Queen. These two are again relative.

Normal people may never be able to differentiate. This may be the case even for some like me. Hence, the reliance on coffee experts to share their experience, which we know they do after pulling comparable shots.
Break things down to their simplest component & function. You have a machine, a grinder & coffee.

The most important variables, in terms of the things you can control, are how much coffee you use, how fine you grind, how much liquid you pull into the cup. Whatever machine you have, it's the same process, the targets may change a little.

EY is a measure of brew efficiency & consistency, it's relevant if you have no other malfunctions and not, by itself, a measure of quality. Every cup has an EY, if it tastes good, the EY is within your preference...even if that is different to the next person. Espresso is the most expensive way to make coffee, I understand not wanting the expense of a refractometer & syringe filters, but it seems an arbitrary preference after spending the best part of £3k? Your costs are still going to rise after purchase in bags of coffee if nothing else. I don't often measure my espresso, nevertheless have found it useful in navigating what works vs myth & legend.

Taste is correlated to EY region of interest, they're complimentary...you make something that tastes nice, then you note the EY, rather than hit an EY and wonder if you like it :)

Mouthfeel is the easiest thing to take care of, grind fine & pull short, just try to avoid very silty & sour shots. It is separate to EY & may be detrimental to clarity (accessability of taste).

Normal people can tell the difference between an unpleasant extraction and a tasty one (normal people were the sample for the SCAA/MRI/CBI brewing control chart), anyone can tell if they like/dislike a shot (assuming they like the coffee used - using an ingredient that you prefer is the most important thing), like they can with any food/drink. If you have to wonder/ask yourself, then you probably don't like it that much/enough to justify the effort & expense.

If someone else has a different preference to you and is hitting it repeatedly, that's great for them, but not necessarily what you need. That's really where discussions & recommendations can start getting overly specific...we can come to a consensus that a given machine/grinder works as intended, niche (with a small 'n') preferences are less relevant universally, no matter how fascinating.
 
If I pack the stock basket with 15g of finely ground coffee vs 18g of a little coarser grind, would there be a little more resistance at 15g than 18g?

I am curious what happens to the extraction, 2) how the mass and surface area differ, 3) how the density of the puck differ and change the cup. I know we can't answer unless we try these on the machine.

Another doubt is what is important - is it the mass or density ?

I would assume other things being equal for these doubts.

Sorry to post such basic questions, which deviate from the main intent of this thread; there is no need to answer if seen not relevant. Thanks
I guess these are the fundamental scientific questions that the guys over at Decent are attempting to answer!
 
Depends on what people characterise as "work better" More body and mouthfeel? More extraction yield ?

its easy to say taste better but again, so many variables ( preference and type of coffee used ) that it makes general comments somewhat meaningless without a little more context.
Distracted for an hour while writing below, and many posts - anyway ...

The mention I made re. Hb and baskets It was less to do with flavour and more to do with channelling if I remember correctly. It's in the first post (link below ) here re. "Dose to the circlip".

https://www.home-barista.com/levers/izzo-alex-leva-dosing-baskets-accessories-and-springs-t65129.html

Which in turn referenced/summarised this thread:

https://www.home-barista.com/levers/baskets-and-dose-for-lsm-group-levers-t61507.html

Maybe that is useful I thought. Anyway thereafter - extraction yield/dosage/etc - I'm going to watch this thread closely, and experiment accordingly.

I'm interested particularly on the impact of very large flat grinders say 98mm(i.e. low fines), in combination with the higher pressures of LSM, and the basket types/depths/holes/layout etc available when. Any real world feedback on above would be useful in time. Biased obviously as thinking about a new grinder and toying between conical and larger flat..;-)
 
981 - 1,000 of 3,176 Posts